Columbus spending full $20.1 million on summer months youth program funding

Right before participating in on the Ohio Point out men’s basketball Last 4 squad in the 1998-1999 year, George Reese expended numerous hrs in the Brentnell Neighborhood Heart gym.

Now, Reese, the founder of Generally With Us Charities, which supplies “academic chances” and a “protected and nutritious atmosphere” to East Side youth, Reese returned to his childhood hardwood Tuesday to thank city leaders for funding initiatives like his individual.

Reese preceded a selection of speakers at a news convention Tuesday all through which Mayor Andrew J. Ginther declared that the town is investing an added $8.9 million into summer season youth programming this calendar year, on prime of the $11.2 million that experienced previously been allotted. The speakers cited violence avoidance and lingering effects of COVID as principal catalysts for the funding.

The funds will be distribute to extra than 90 businesses to present Columbus young ones and teenagers with camp, positions, internships and other relevant prospects, Ginther mentioned at the convention.

Following what Ginther explained as a “competitive” funding proposal application method for space businesses, the town picked companies greatest suited to “lower youth violence, boost workforce readiness, link youth with instruction and employment and provide tutorial enrichment.”

The complete $20.1 million invested in youth summer months programming this year is a move up from the $16.2 million last 12 months.

Ginther, Columbus Metropolis Council president Shannon G. Hardin and council member Emmanuel V. Remy all pressured the need to guidance a youth demographic they say was specially stymied by the pandemic.

“No team was a lot more disproportionately, negatively impacted by the pandemic,” Ginther mentioned.

With funding underway, Hardin has daring ambitions for the summertime programming.

“Because of this funding and for the reason that of the courses that are remaining added to this local community this summer season, each youthful person in Columbus must be equipped to get a work, must be able to get an internship, or to be equipped to actively interact in a summer season program that will enrich them,” he said.

Other speakers at the information convention were being Carla Williams-Scott, director of

Read More... Read More

Report, auditor’s online hub focus on Columbus tax incentive results

Want to know if a development in Franklin County received government tax breaks and whether it actually created the jobs, payroll and investment it promised?

There’s now a quick way to do that via a revamped website —  complete with interactive map — and a new report issued this month by Franklin County Auditor Michael Stinziano.

“Any member of the public can go out and look across the county at what tax incentives are being made in their community,” Stinziano said. “You can hover, look at a specific project and links to the local jurisdictions’ economic development folks. … We’re doing everything we can to hold folks accountable, that the promises made are being followed.”

Franklin County Auditor Michael Stinziano

As auditor, Stinziano heads the Tax Incentive Review Council (TIRC), a panel required under state law and includes officials from county, municipal or township authorities that grant tax exemptions, school boards affected by the agreements and others.

Cities, villages, townships and counties establish and approve tax-exemption agreements. TIRCs meet annually to review whether job creation, payroll, capital investment and other requirements in those deals are being met and to make recommendations whether incentives should be continued, modified or canceled.

In Franklin County, the reviews typically take place between May and August, in advance of a Sept. 1 deadline required under state law. Stinziano released his detailed report of the latest review this week.

More:Franklin County commissioners seek tax-sharing on three residential TIF districts

Abatements and other financial incentives used by public officials to lure commitments for new or expanding developments have prompted plenty of public debate.

Business groups and others generally support the tax exemptions, saying they’re necessary to compete with other areas working to attract economic development projects.

Nate Green, executive director of the Ohio Jobs Alliance, said in testimony this year to the Ohio House Ways and Means Committee that “property tax abatements can address Ohio’s high tax and property costs and drive not just job creation but also local tax revenues.”

Opponents counter that the tax breaks aren’t having their intended effect and instead take needed revenues away from schools

Read More... Read More